Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Redman

Judah/ David/& Yeshua(same line/Jews) where described as having a ruddy (1 Sam.17:42) completion (to show blood in the face/blush/white or light skinned) and haveing dark (brown) eyes (Gen.49:12).

David was described as being (H#132) 'admônı̂y- red (ruddy) "reddish (of the hair or the *complexion): - red, ruddy (1 Sam.17:42). "Adam" (H#120)in Gen carries this same context (Gen.1:26) 'âdâm ruddy, that is, a human being (an individual or the species, mankind, etc.): - X another, + hypocrite, + common sort, X low, man (mean, of low degree), person. from a root that is---- (H#119)'âdam which means "To show blood (in the face), that is, flush or turn rosy: - be (dyed, made) red (ruddy)."
 Is this a literal red? Yes ("red" "complexion" in relation to showing blood in the face so if not constantly a "reddish" then at least light enough to blush and be "flush".)

"Black" is used in relation to the skin to describe afflictions (spiritual and physical states) NOT race. Sadly "black Hebrew Israelites" like to pervert the context of these verses and just focuss on the "black skin" in their attempts to replace Judah. This requires totally ignoring the Surrounding texts in all of thease areas.

Examples:
> Lam.5:10 Our skin was black like an oven *because of the terrible famine. (Thus it has NOTHING to do with their Race. Its a statement of degredation much like repenting in ash and sack cloth .)
Honestly i find it rather notable that most members of the "Black Hebrew Israelites" never seem to get around to sharing Torah or the Gospel in any real fashion cause they put all their time and effort into highlighting and exhaulting their race.

> Job.30:30 "My skin grows black and peels; my body burns with fever. "
kjv- "My skin is black upon me, and my bones are burned with heat."
 עוֹרִי שָׁחַר מֵעָלָי וְעַצְמִי חָרָה מִנִּי חֹרֶב:
Heb. חרה, an expression of a thing that is burned and dried through the heat of the fire, like (Jer. 6:29), “The bellows is heated (נחר) ” ; (Ezek. 15: 4), “and the middle of it is burned (נחר).”
Whats the surrounding scriptures?

> Job.30:26-31
When I looked for good, then evil came unto me: and when I waited for light, there came darkness My bowels boiled, and rested not: the days of affliction prevented me. I went mourning without the sun: I stood up, and I cried in the congregation. I am a brother to dragons, and a companion to owls. My skin is black upon me, and my bones are burned with heat. My harp also is turned to mourning, and my organ into the voice of them that weep.
this AGAIN SHOWS affliction.

> Songs 1:5-6 I am black, but comely, O ye daughters of Jerusalem, as the tents of Kedar, as the curtains of Solomon Look not upon me, because I am black, because the sun hath looked upon me: my mother's children were angry with me; they made me the keeper of the vineyards; but mine own vineyard have I not kept.
........(Its obvious black isnt in relation to his race but Again in relation to affliction thus why he says look not upon me cause i am black. Its not a shame to be of a black race.) You, my friends, let me not be light in your eyes even if my husband has left me because of my blackness, for I am black because of the sun’s gaze, but I am comely with the shape of beautiful limbs, and if I am black as the tents of Kedar, which are blackened by the rain, for they are constantly spread out in the deserts, I am easily cleansed to be like the curtains of Solomon. The allegory is that the congregation of Israel says to the nations: I am black in my deeds, but I am comely in the deeds of my ancestors, and even some of my deeds are comely. If I am guilty of the iniquity of the [Golden] Calf, I can counter it with the merit of the acceptance of the Torah (Song Rabbah). He calls the nations the daughters of Jerusalem because she [Jerusalem] is destined to become the metropolis for them all, as Ezekiel prophesied (16:61): “and I shall give them to you for daughters,” like (Josh. 15:45): “Ekron, with her towns (וּבְנוֹהֶיהָ).”


In relation to light white has the whole spectrum but in relation to color black includes all colors and white is simply the lack of color (which I have noticed has become a debate of its own among people that dont seem to know the difference, yet can be observed if you simpley take all colors (pain/crayons/..) and put in same location). What i personally dont really understand is why all computer spectrumes of color had red at both ends. Anyway, If the first man was red in complection and through time certain lines were formed in which the the tone of skin ranged from what we commonly call "black and white" what were the contributing factors?
First of all I have never actually seena "white" person I have seen real light tan or pinkish though.So does sunlight play a role in relation to the complextion (showing blood in the face)? does the spacific seedlines relate to complextion and if so how and why in relation to a red orgin? Feel fre to leave comments. I am also familure with stances that there was more than one man and woman present in days of Adam and Eve which is open for discussion in comments but please not discussion on universal evolution from apes (or whatever). Please if you want to discuss this post do so in relation to the Bible.

Monday, November 4, 2013

random responce to interracial

*^#^%*& Deut.7:2 speaks against it, as do many scriptures but in what reguards? Those OF Israel were not to mix with those outside of Israel (in relation to carrying the phy line of Israel). This carries over to the faith cause in Torah (Judaism) tribal identification is made through the Father (physical line carries promise like in David/Judah -king line... Levi- priestline thus a LEVITICAL high priest had to track his lieniage back to Levi (aaron through both Maother and Father and a king of Israel had to track line back through father to David)and yet if ones mother isnt of the desendants of Jacob (Israel) they are not counted as of the congreagtion (of Israel/ literally /phy/ and faith). In relation to the faith the mother carries the wieght cause we are told that those Men that marry woman that arent of Israel that the child is in danger of loosing the faith (Deut 7 but this isnt mentioned in relation to the child of a none Jewish/Israeli father that has a mother of Israel). When a physical line is Breached then that is a New line, new people, nation and so forth which is seen throughout scripture. Example Hagar was Egyptian and Sarah wasnt the weight of the inheritance (relates to calling) went to Isaac cause hagar and Ishmael were sent out / look at seperation Of Cain.. He went forth bringing up a new people, following the flood the sons of Noah were scattered and brought up a new people. We also see in the Tanakh that those jews that were slaves or had slaves were allowed non Jewish wives cause a Jewish women isnt to be put in bondage and when Israel was cleansed the Men put off all their non Jewish wives and children. When a Jew man is given oppertunity to freedom (after time limit of slavery in Judaism) If he were to choose freedom he would have to leave wife and kids cause they were still property of slave owner (employer) thus reason they werent given Jewish women. So interracial bonds are bonds and no ones birth is a sin (reguarding any offspring of interracial or non interracial marriages).In other words what a interracial bond has is theirs and isnt directly wrong or bad but is not what was being carried before in their line thats leads up to this new (mix). In islam its somewhat the opposite. If your Father (head of the house) is muslim BOOM you are considered Muslim. http://friendsnchrist.ning.com/.../topics/levitical-marriage <--at the bottom of this link you may find some good info on subject, And here is another link for whomsoever will http://friendsnchrist.ning.com/profiles/blog/show